Thank you!

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown ...

Minimal Design

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown ...

Download high quality wordpress themes at top-wordpress.net

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown ...

Easy to use theme admin panel

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown ...

Archive for June 2013

Theeya Velai Seiyanum Kumaru (Kumar, you should work hard!) - Laughter Mantra!!



TVSK, directed by Sundar C and produced under his own (Khushboo’s) banner, has an inspired title from the political thriller ‘Pudhupettai’, where the lead (Dhanush) gets conned by a wicked politician (Azhagam Perumal) who says these lines in order to cool things off! After watching the movie, I realized that not only the title but also the storyline has been heavily inspired, thanks to the trendsetting blockbuster of the past decade, ‘Minsara Kanavu’. But Sundar C made sure that the laughter mantra was not compromised at any point and things rolled on smoothly.

Kumar (Siddharth) who pushes his luck really hard to find a girlfriend, resorts to a ‘love guru’, Mokia (Santhaanam) to woo his love interest Sanjana (Hansika). Kumar tastes success after overcoming the funny twists that come along his way and that which get dissolved by themselves only to have a cliched and happy ending.

The laughter mantra was bang on and the director had got his vision rooted for the target segment, the family audiences. However the selling point of the movie was once again Santhaanam and a neat presentation which had an appeal for the family audiences.

Siddharth was yet again cast in a boy-next-door character that demanded him to heavily underplay his role, especially once when Santhaanam pitches in, he was almost sidelined and Santhaanam took the center stage.

Hansika looked better with a trimmed figure which was sort of a makeover, but her acting was a mere rehash of all the emotions that she displayed from her previous movies. Calling herself as a ‘mini-khushboo’ cannot make her any better as Khushboo was a decent actor in her prime days as well.

Santhaanam can be declared as the captain of the ship and he smoothly sailed the ship across rough tides with poise.

Ganesh Venkatram in a supporting role walked tall. He had no qualms in giving a cue that he would be sidelined along the way for the hero to win the heroine’s heart.

‘Big FM’ Balaji in a quirky role was sort of a revelation and delivered the goods in his own style even though he had little canvas to unleash what he had.

The supporting cast can be compared to the menu of a traditional South Indian marriage where there were actors who can bring out emotions at varying levels.

Screenplay and dialogues by Nalan Kumarasamy, who directed the recent runaway hit ‘Soodhu Kavvum’ was refreshing and rehashed at the same time. The songs were however a dampener and brought in boredom.

Editing by Praveen and Srikanth was above average, but could have been crisper in the latter half.

Music by Sathya did not help the movie much.

Cinematography by Gopi Amarnath was somewhat eye catchy, especially the songs in the foreign locales.

The movie can be watched once for its feel good factor and comic presentation. On the whole, director Sundar did what he is good at - impress the family audiences and made them smile all the way!!

Verdict: One Time Watch!

Rating: 2.5/5

Thillu Mullu - Resurrected or Reheated?




I am sure there wouldn't be anyone in Tamil Nadu who have not enjoyed the cult classic, Thillu Mullu that got released in the early 80s. Directed by Balachander, the movie has been telecast so many times in different television channels that some of the dialogs have become a regular even while we tend to use them on a day-to-day context. The movie itself was a remake of a Hindi original called ‘Gol Maal’. Since the current crop of directors prefer to take a shortcut to stardom with short films or remakes, director Bhadri who had done a couple of unknown movies had decided to dwell on brand ‘Thillu Mullu’.

A big relief was that the director had not gone for a scene-by-scene remake and had invested his thoughts on a fresh presentation that will suit the sensibilities of the current generation while trying to retain the original essence of the script. The first step in implementing that was through roping in a whacky actor like ‘Shiva’, who has done some comic roles in the past and hence the premise to this remake was established well.

Shiva breathed in oxygen to the script that had some breathing problems every now and again primarily due to a rehashed and crass screenplay. Since we had seen him in ‘Tamizh padam’, his character gelled well for his profile. His sense of humor was immaculate and the timing was precise. Also he had the additional burden of doing a role that was made memorable by none other than our 'Super Star'. His execution was precise as his character definition was proper.

Isha Talwar in the heroine’s role was a big let down. She hardly got her expressions right and the mouth sync was a fiasco.

Prakash Raj with his ‘Muruga’ philosophy was engaging, but failed to deliver anything special.

‘Kovai’ Sarala’s role was overdone with a spear always poked across her tongue and so it lost the fizz after the second time.

Ilavarasu’s character could have made much more impactful.

‘Parotta’ Soori’s role was a new addition but was not a justifying attempt as he has not delivered the goods as was expected from him.

Santhanam had a guest appearance at the end to mark a similar one done by Kamal in the 1980’s classic. But somehow Santhanam just managed to pass muster as expectations were sky high on him.

Music by Yuvan was a mere upgrade from MS Viswanathan’s classics from the original.

Editing was again a disappointing department wherein an extra song and the last 30 minutes could have been trimmed down or totally chopped off as they added little value to the story. Also they acted as speed breakers in an otherwise pacy script.
Cinematography was bad as there were so many out-of-focus shots and one can see mics popping out on screen more often than not.

The movie would have been much more engaging had the director cared to add some more comic elements and discipline in his script.

Verdict: Below Average

Rating: 2/5